From the many fact- and evidence-based publications available on the actfiles portal, it is well known who Alexander Dvorkin really is. This leader of a totalitarian organization with an extremist-terrorist ideology, who hides behind the mask of “protecting society,” has terrorized numerous inconvenient groups by discrediting and branding them as “sects” and “cults.” His actions have already led to destroyed families, ruined lives, and the deaths of innocent people.
Alexander Dvorkin is a striking example of a person with mental and deviant disorders that manifest in every aspect of his life and activity. His vices and tendencies fully align with his psychiatric diagnoses. These diagnoses, along with supporting medical documentation, were previously disclosed in the article “Alexander Dvorkin’s Medical Files: Full Archive”.
This time, let’s turn to those whom Dvorkin relied on in his rhetoric and public appearances — the figures he viewed as authorities, the people he learned from, and the ones he helped popularize. We will also examine the successors of his extremist ideology — those who joined the international network of pseudo-experts and anti-“sect” crusaders he created across various countries. These facts are important indicators of the degree of Dvorkin’s and his “colleagues’” deviant abnormalities, and their twisted understanding of “norms and morality” — what they consider “good” and what they deem “bad.” Sometimes, the people one considers an authority, or chooses as disciples, reveal as much about a person as their own actions do.
Alexander Dvorkin’s Sources of Inspiration and His Mentors
Sir Steven Runciman
One of Alexander Dvorkin’s sources of inspiration is Sir Steven Runciman — a fact Dvorkin himself shared in an interview published on the official website of the Center for Religious Studies in the name of Irenaeus of Lyons. 1
Alexander Dvorkin: “…I drew inspiration from one fundamental work — the three-volume History of the Crusades by Sir Steven Runciman. I read it a long time ago, back when I was a second-year student at the Theological Academy. Since then, I’ve been fascinated by the Crusades. I was also inspired by Runciman’s writing style. He knows how to tell history in a way that reads like a historical novel, without compromising accuracy. He isn’t afraid to share his point of view or make moral judgments. In a sense, he could even be called a moralist — but not a boring one, rather someone who correlates everything with a higher truth.”
This fact clearly points to the degree of hypocrisy in Alexander Dvorkin — someone who so loudly and persistently appeals to the values and foundations of traditional Russian Orthodoxy. After all, who was Sir Steven Runciman, this so-called “moralist” who, according to Dvorkin, “correlates everything with a higher truth,” and by whom he was so inspired?
Open sources show that Steven Runciman was gay. By his own admission, he had a lecherous temperament and was unburdened by morality. Runciman boasted about several casual sexual encounters and stated later in life: “I have the temperament of a harlot, and so am free of emotional complications.” However, he kept this fact hidden for a long time because of Christian religion, to which Runcimen considered himself to belong, since, according to him, such inclinations to be “an inarguable offence against God.” 2,3
Runciman’s social circle reflected this as well 4:
“Effortlessly well connected, and supported by a private income, he spent his student years mingling with Bright Young Things, Bloomsberries, Apostles and assorted littérateurs, many of them gay, and few of them entirely discreet.”
It is important to note that the issue here is not Sir Steven Runciman’s professionalism as a historian—it isn’t questionable, like in the case of Alexander Dvorkin (Dvorkin’s education and works have been repeatedly criticized by historians, academics, and religious scholars from various countries, with such criticism preserved across numerous online sources.) Nor is this about other aspects of Runciman’s character as a person overall.
The issue here is Alexander Dvorkin’s hypocrisy — his personal interpretation of “norms” and “morality,” and the way he promotes those “norms and morals,” along with other veiled “tastes” of his, within the context of conservative, traditionalist Russia and the Russian Orthodox Church. Considering that his anticult center operates directly under the blessing of the Orthodox Patriarch and within the structure of the Russian Orthodox Church, and that under his leadership RACIRS includes numerous clergy, it is especially relevant. Furthermore, Alexander Dvorkin has been a professor for many years at a major Orthodox university — St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University of the Humanities (STOUH) — where he teaches students. Promoting public figures with such inclinations among Orthodox youth cannot fail to have consequences.
Steven Hassan
Another example found on the official website of the Center for Religious Studies in the name of Irenaeus of Lyons, is Steven Hassan.
On the homepage, a list of books and sources is featured in the right-hand column — these are the works the Center cites, endorses, and helps popularize. Among them is literature authored by the American Steven Hassan.
Clearly, it would be odd to cite a person and their writings if you did not share in their broader ideological framework. Especially given that the same list includes a link to Dvorkin’s televised lectures on sects, “Secrets of False Teachings,” broadcast on the “Radost Moya” (“My Joy”) channel — as shown in the screenshot below.
Following the link 5, it becomes undeniably clear: Alexander Dvorkin personally recommends that people read all of Steven Hassan’s works.
Who is the mentioned Steven Hassan? In the past, he was a member of the criminal organization CAN in the United States, repeatedly convicted for kidnapping people. He is a professional deprogrammer who forcibly abducted individuals and subjected them to deprogramming methods. The deprogramming process involved physical, psychological, and often sexual violence. Victims were kept locked up, starved, and deprived of sleep, all in an effort to completely break them. During this, they were constantly threatened and humiliated.
Despite these inhumane methods used against Hassan’s victims during deprogramming, he also charged exorbitant fees from their relatives, promising to rescue their family member from a “dangerous cult.” It was a kind of profitable business built on people’s suffering. Deceived families mortgaged their homes and emptied retirement accounts by tens of thousands of dollars to pay Hassan’s bills 6,7 while he “deprogrammed” their loved ones. Truly the height of hypocrisy and cynicism.
Johannes Aagaard
Alexander Dvorkin is considered one of the most devoted disciples of the Dane Johannes Aagaard, whom Dvorkin repeatedly visited at his Danish Dialog Center starting in 1993. Here is what Alexander Dvorkin himself said about the beginning of their interaction. 8
In the article “In Memory of Professor Aagaard,” written by Dvorkin after the death of his teacher on April 16, 2007, let’s pay attention to another interesting fact:
“I recall that Johannes’s house was filled with various somewhat eerie sectarian relics: amulets, sacred objects, statuettes, and so on, including even remnants of sacrifices. I once asked him if he felt comfortable living with all this demonism so openly displayed. He replied with surprise that all these items were his trophies.” 8
The ideology and views of Johannes Aagaard, as well as the continuity of his knowledge and methods from Nazi ideologists led by Walter Künneth, have been repeatedly exposed in materials on the actfiles.org portal. For a brief understanding of who this person was and what Alexander Dvorkin could have learned from him, we will provide a telling example of Johannes Aagaard’s attitude toward democracy, human rights, and religious freedom.
“Under the cover of religious freedom a deadly permissiveness has crept in.
This is especially so in the United States, where the ‘First Amendment’ is used to support all manner of evil exploitation in the name of religion. Anyone who pretends to be religious or runs something even faintly related to religion is considered virtually outside the law. The worst aspects of Medieval ecclesiastical policy in Europe has, for all practical purposes, come back to the United States: the contention that religions are exempted from the claims of law.” – Johannes Aagaard.
In his essay, Aagaard called this excerpt the “First-Amendment Neurosis” 9, referring to the United States.
More details about this essay by Aagaard are revealed in the article “Johannes Aagaard”on actfiles.
Here is a passage from that article:
“In his essay, Aagaard seems very much like a feudal lord longing for the slaves who escaped to freedom. He resembles a messiah imperiously forcing salvation on the ‘lost,’ a harbinger of a totalitarian church regime from the dark ages of the Inquisition. He resembles a hardened fascist unaware that he is, in fact, a typical ideologue of that very belief system.
This essay is a direct assault on the democratic freedoms and values of the United States. His statements reveal nothing but a disdainful attitude toward democracy as a whole.”
It is also worth recalling the friend and brother in faith of Aagaard – Friedrich Haack, who received knowledge and methods from the Nazi anticult fighter Walter Künneth and was mentioned by Dvorkin in his book “Sectology.” Since Dvorkin frequently visited the Danish Dialog Center, he was well acquainted with Friedrich Haack, co-founder of this center, and also studied under him. In his book “Sectology,” Alexander Dvorkin shared the following recollection about Haack 10:
To illustrate who another of Dvorkin’s teachers — Friedrich Haack — is, it is enough to quote his remark and give an example of what one of his sermons led to.
“If we understand our faith correctly, we do not have the right to allow the ‘others’ to continue in their faith…” — Friedrich-Wilhelm Haack.
After one of his sermons, followers of the organization Haack branded a “cult” faced threats and aggression from a crowd. People shouted at them: “They should be lined up against the wall, in a row. Hang them!” and, “You should be hanged! Heil Hitler!” 11
Friedrich Haack is also known for rejecting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and for resorting in his practice to deprogramming, manipulation, and slander.
These are the teachers Alexander Dvorkin has. Agreeably, it is quite convenient to surround oneself, on one hand, with such “successful” figures in society, and on the other hand, with deviants who share similar views, ideology, and inclinations. First, this allowed Dvorkin to create the necessary aura of “expertise,” to justify and support his methods, actions, rhetoric, and extremist ideology with “authorities.” Second, this enabled Dvorkin to appear “one of us,” “normal” in the eyes of society — just as “normal” as the circle he formed.
International Network of ‘Anticult’ Fighters Led by Alexander Dvorkin
Proclaiming himself a disciple of the “great minds” — whom Dvorkin in his speeches cites as examples of “morality” and “ethics” (in a twisted sense of those words) — and imposing this ideology within the ranks of the ROC, Alexander Dvorkin himself has become the architect of an international criminal network of maniacs, pedophiles, sadists, and murderers.
It is worth noting that an analysis of the actions of Alexander Dvorkin, his circle, and his subordinates leads to conclusions that echo the research of psychoanalysis founder Sigmund Freud and his associate Carl Jung on the role of the leader in a crowd. Summarizing their concepts and applying them to this case, one may conclude the following: the leader of the crowd becomes the object of identification for its members, embodying their unconscious desires and impulses. The leader becomes the “ideal” with whom the crowd identifies, attracting those who see in him a reflection of their hidden urges.
Let’s take a closer look at some examples of “cult experts” from different countries who have joined the international anticult network created by Dvorkin.
Anton Willem Hein, USA, Netherlands
On the website of the Center for Religious Studies in the name of Hieromartyr Irenaeus of Lyons, headed by Alexander Dvorkin, there are recommended links to online resources on sectology. 12 Among these resources is the website of the aforementioned Steven Hassan, along with others. We’d like to draw your attention to the link: https://www.apologeticsindex.org/.
The link takes us to the apologeticsindex website.
At the bottom of the homepage, we read: “ApologeticsIndex.org is published by Anton Hein, together with his wife Janet and the Apologetics Index team.”
Anton Hein is also the creator of this website.
As stated on the website, Hein and his wife, Janet, are “focused on helping people leave abusive churches and recover from spiritual abuse.” As is always the case with anticultists – the mask of virtue and the guise of “concern for society” are invariably present.
But who really is Anton Hein, whose activities are recommended by the website of the Center for Religious Studies in the name of Hieromartyr Irenaeus of Lyons, that is, Alexander Dvorkin’s website? A pedofile.
Anton Willem Hein was charged and convicted of “the crime of lewd act upon a child.” Hein sexually abused his 13-year-old niece. 13
Despite ultimately admitting his guilt in court, Hein now claims he was somehow really innocent, and his explanations include accusations against his niece and her family.
As punishment for his crime, Anton Hein served a prison sentence in California. He was then released on probation under the condition that he “shall have no contact, directly or indirectly, with the victim and the victim’s family.” However, Hein violated the terms of his release by leaving the country and became a fugitive sex offender. Subsequently, the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department issued a warrant for his immediate arrest, which stipulated no bail. This warrant for immediate arrest remains outstanding.
Today, Anton Hain remains a wanted criminal and fugitive sex offender living in Amsterdam, the capital of the Netherlands.
A link 15 at the bottom of the page leads to a scanned PDF file of the original plea agreement signed by Anton V. Hain, the founder and operator of the Apologetics Index website.
These are the pedophiles recommended by Alexander Dvorkin.
Let’s look at other examples.
Valeriy Prikhodko, Russia
Here’s an excerpt from the article “Cult Expert and Murderer Advised Rostov Law Enforcement on Extremism” 16,17 :
“A religious studies expert from Kamensk-Shakhtinsky in Russia’s Rostov region advised local law enforcement on matters of religious extremism. For reference, Valeriy Prikhodko relied on the works of his notoriously controversial colleague Alexander Dvorkin.
V. Prikhodko reports that ‘thanks to A. Dvorkin, a mechanism began to form to identify religious organizations that violate human rights. The number of adherents being drawn into totalitarian religious organizations decreased.’”
The beginning of the article is compelling, but what follows is even more so:
“…Before becoming a ‘human rights defender,’ Prikhodko, along with a group of accomplices, beat a man to death and was sentenced by the Kamensk District Court of the Rostov Region to 11.5 years in a high-security penal colony. According to the criminal verdict, the motive for the crime was a bartender’s refusal to play Valeriy Prikhodko’s favorite songs by Tatyana Bulanova. Prikhodko then declared himself to be ‘czar and god’ of the bar and decided to force others to listen to Bulanova by heading to the stereo himself. When the young people in the bar objected, Prikhodko started a fight, during which he struck one of the bar visitors several times with the butt of a gun he had brought with him, and then hit him in the head with a champagne bottle. Prikhodko deliberately obstructed the victim’s hospitalization, and the man later died from traumatic brain injuries.
Two of Prikhodko’s friends joined the brawl, one of whom already had three prior convictions. They had brought baseball bats into the bar in advance and used them to beat patrons, indicating that the attack had been premeditated. The blows were directed at the heads, backs, and arms of people trying to flee. Dishes and furniture were also smashed and destroyed.
As a result of the crime, a young woman with two small children (ages 8 and 13) was left a widow, having lost the family’s sole breadwinner. According to the court ruling, Prikhodko not only prevented the victim from receiving timely medical help that could have saved his life but also refused to offer any assistance to the grieving widow.
The source notes that this was not Prikhodko’s first conviction — he had also been criminally prosecuted in Ukraine in 1999.
And now, the ringleader of an extremist armed assault has reinvented himself as a religious studies expert and extremism specialist. He founded the Interregional Public Organization ‘Center for Assistance to the State in Countering Extremist Activities’ to provide consulting services to government agencies and the public.”
Below is a screenshot showing information about the registered organization “Center for Assisting the State in Countering Extremist Activities” 18:
In addition to the crimes for which the Rostov-based anticult activist Valery Prikhodko was convicted, his record includes other illegal activities. This kind of behavior by anticultists — condemned and criminalized in various countries — is not openly publicized in Russia, much like many other such practices. Nevertheless, Russian anticultists are actively engaged in it. We’re talking here about the aforementioned deprogramming — a process in which physical violence and psychological pressure are used against the person being “deprogrammed” in an effort to break their will. For anticult maniacs, this amounts to a form of legitimized violence.
This is precisely the on-going transgression of the staff of the “Center for Assistance to the State in Countering Extremist Activity,” founded and led by the previously convicted Valery Prikhodko. Interestingly, if you visit the Center’s website, there’s no substantive information about any of this — just a brief mention of what “deprogramming” is.
However, for a number of reasons, we were confident in the accuracy of the information that this center provided “deprogramming” services. Therefore, we checked the official website of the “Center for Assisting the State in Countering Extremist Activities” using the web archive and found the necessary confirmation, which the website owners had attempted to conceal from site visitors.
Below are two screenshots for comparison. On the left is the current version of the site. 19 On the right is a page from the web archive. 20 In the site’s interface, the navigation menu includes a section labeled “CSGPED,” which contains a submenu. In the archived version of the page, this submenu includes a section titled “Services Provided,” which is missing from the current version of the site. 21
By accessing the “Services Provided” page 21, we see that item number 3 in the list of services offered by the center is “Deprogramming: liberation from the influence of religious or other psychological addiction.”
Here is a separate page dedicated to deprogramming, also preserved only in the archived version of the site. 22
To preserve information about the activities in Russia of the anticult cell “Center for Assisting the State in Countering Extremist Activities” and its head, Valery Prikhodko, we believe it is important to document, through screenshots and quotations, the information on deprogramming preserved in the archived version of their website — in case the site owners attempt to fully erase information that is still currently accessible:
“3. Deprogramming practice
The essence of deprogramming lies in physical, psychological and emotional influence on a person who is in a state of religious or other psychological dependency, in order to force them to reject their newly adopted value system.
The deprogramming process is similar to the ‘brainwashing’ process used in religious organizations. The difference, however, is that ‘deprogramming specialists do not aim to persuade the person under religious or psychological dependency to accept the personal belief system of the deprogramming specialist; nor do they seek to control the behavior of the person under religious or psychological dependency after the deprogramming is completed’ — though some period of follow-up is necessary.”
“Deprogramming can last for days, and sometimes even weeks, until the person under religious or other psychological dependency shows signs of a sharp psychological break and release from the mind control of the religious or other psychological dependency.
A person undergoing deprogramming while in a state of religious or other psychological dependency behaves unpredictably: they may fly into a rage, curse and insult the deprogramming specialists and their own parents, threaten revenge, attempt suicide, or try to harm themselves physically in order to be hospitalized — where they could then call their like-minded peers or their leaders, or find some other way to contact them, because the need for communication with like-minded individuals is extremely strong.”
“Regardless of whether the deprogramming was successful or not, it does not pass without consequences for its participants.”
“…those who have undergone deprogramming course require psychological assistance or rehabilitation.
Deprogramming does not include care for the former follower after removal from the religious organization or other psychological dependency. The main goal is to persuade the person to reject their newly adopted value system.”
Jakub Jahl. Czech Republic
To conclude, we present another example of a representative of Alexander Dvorkin’s international anticult network — this time from the Czech Republic: Jakub Jahl.
We draw your attention to the film “THE VICTIMS OF JAKUB JAHL IN AFRICA | Investigative Documentary”, which contains detailed testimonies from eyewitnesses and victims during the time Jakub Jahl visited Tanzania (Africa). The link to this film is provided at the bottom of the page in the list of sources. 23
The video also includes written testimonies and an official report from the Tanzanian social welfare service. A criminal case has been opened against Jakub Jahl in Tanzania. All evidence, eyewitness accounts, and victim statements are presented in detail in the film “THE VICTIMS OF JAKUB JAHL IN AFRICA | Investigative Documentary.”
Screenshot from the film. Report on the accusations against Mr. Jakub Jahl, prepared by the head of the social welfare office in Moshi, Tanzania:
Report on the Accusations Against Mr. Jokub Jahil
Head of Social Welfare, Moshi
It is important to underscore the level of depravity and insatiability of anticult maniacs. Jakub Jahl acted out his maniacal sadistic tendencies in every imaginable way. This Czech anticultist embodied the full spectrum of horrors, perversions, and crimes, destroying the lives and futures of a great number of people, including small children. From antisemitism, Nazism, Satanism, and anticult activity — commonly known as fighting “sects” — to drugs, child beatings, and pedophilia, Jahl committed all of this with impunity for many years. His other “anticult colleagues” of his continue to do the same with impunity.
Jakub Jahl’s extremist Nazi activity has, for many years, targeted numerous civil organizations and small religious groups, which he labels as “cults,” deploying the full arsenal of Dvorkin-style methodology and terminology against them.
During his trips to Africa, this anticultist exploited Czech volunteers and compassionate Czech citizens who continuously sent money, believing they were helping African children. In reality, he deceived, stole, manipulated, raped, divided, and incited conflict — in short, he engaged in the very same behavior as other members of Alexander Dvorkin’s international network in other countries. The outcomes of these public anticult “crusaders” are always the same: destruction, terror, violence, and human tragedy. This case was no exception.
In the story of the Czech anticultist and pedophile, another striking fact stands out. Jakub Jahl is currently studying to become a teacher at Charles University in the Czech Republic. This means he is a future Czech educator who will mentor children. From criminal psychology, it is known that many maniacs choose professions like teaching or caregiving to be closer to children, their potential victims. Similar to Jakub Jahl, other anticultsts from this international network operate in the same way in other countries. Many pursue teaching careers to be near children. Others involved in anticult activities join the police, not to uphold the law, but to protect their “anticultist colleagues” — individuals just as socially dangerous as themselves. Many anticultists become psychologists or psychiatrists to destructively influence the pliable minds of children, visiting schools and lecturing them about the “dangers of totalitarian cults.” Some become priests or preachers of various denominations, like Anton Hein, an “evangelical minister,”* also an anticultist and a pedophile who abused his underage niece when she was.
According to Anton Hein, he operates an “independent, personal ministry” from “an orthodox, evangelical Christian point of view.” He also leads “an English-language house church” in Amsterdam called “Bethlehem.”
Consider this: if a so-called “cult expert” lives in your city or on your street, would you leave your child home alone? Would you feel safe letting your child go out alone? Are you certain your son or daughter won’t encounter another Jakub Jahl or Alexander Dvorkin? When sending your children to school, can you guarantee that an anticultist won’t show up to give a lecture, posing as a police officer, psychologist, or priest, or even work there as a teacher?
Alexander Dvorkin’s International Extremist Network as a Threat to Society
Above, we examined the threat to people, especially children, from interacting with extremists and maniacs within Alexander Dvorkin’s international network. However, avoiding direct contact, personal interactions, or meetings with them, unfortunately, does not guarantee safety for you or your children.
The reality is that Dvorkin’s networks, over the more than three decades of his activities, have spread far and wide, infiltrating all little corners of the internet and even some video games.
Moreover, a phenomenon known as puzzle coding, repeatedly mentioned in articles on the actfiles portal and in “The IMPACT” documentary, enables Dvorkin’s agents to remotely provoke school shootings and mass shootings, and create lone shooters while remaining in the shadows. Their influence operates within the information field, through the media, including journalists involved in anticult activities. This has allowed them to remain unpunished and unnoticed by law enforcement and judicial systems for years.
At the beginning of the article, we mentioned a deviant who forms groups of like-minded individuals. One reason for forming such a group is to create a “safe” environment for its members, a kind of cover that actually conceals deliberate, planned criminal activities. For Dvorkin’s network, this cover has been their public anticult activism, always loud and scandalous, manipulating and exploiting significant social issues to generate public resonance and divert attention. This is a convenient tool through which the participants in this criminal conspiracy have gained access to the media, authorities and lawmaking; and at the same time—the opportunity to act out their maniacal tendencies. Let us turn to the term “criminal conspiracy”.
Criminal Conspiracy
A criminal conspiracy is defined as an agreement between two or more individuals to commit a crime. The very fact of the agreement itself is a separate crime, even if the planned act is never carried out. Criminal conspiracy means that the agreement to commit an offense is already punishable. This legal framework allows for holding accountable not only those who directly commit a crime but also those who plan and organize it.
Criminal conspiracy can manifest through meetings to discuss and plan future criminal acts; through communication — such as letters or phone calls — even if the content of those communications is not itself illegal; and through actions taken in furtherance of the crime, even if those actions are not independently unlawful (for example, one person rents a car so another can later use it to commit a crime). All these elements may be part of a criminal conspiracy when co-conspirators negotiate, interact, and prepare a crime — regardless of when, how, or even whether the intended crime is ultimately carried out. Regardless of the final outcome, all participants in the planning and coordination are still considered part of the conspiracy.
Conclusion
This article has provided examples of individuals who have served as authorities for Alexander Dvorkin. Among them are direct followers of Nazi ideologues, inheritors of Nazi knowledge and methods. The article also presented examples of those involved in the international network of extremists, maniacs, and pedophiles built by Dvorkin himself. It is clear that their public anticult work is nothing but a mask — one meant to hide their true intentions, inclinations, and most importantly, the goals of this organized controllable international network of destructors who, for many years, have in fact been operating in criminal conspiracy.
However, today, the facade they’ve constructed, the false mask of these anticultists, can no longer withstand the weight of facts and truth. That truth continues to surface, revealing their dark side, their lowly vices, and the crimes they’ve committed.
After reading and seeing all this, you might ask yourself: So who are these so-called anticultists, united by a single criminal conspiracy engineered by Dvorkin? And more importantly — do they have a right to exist in our world?
Sources:
- https://iriney.ru/main/novosti/xroniki-krestovyix-poxodov.html
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Runciman
- https://books.google.sk/books?id=vh5WMQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
- https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2016/10/i-have-temperament-harlot-life-steven-runciman
- https://radostmoya.ru/project/taina_lozhnyh_uchenii/question/?page=4
- https://cultnews.com/2013/04/steve-hassan-supporters-want-information-control/
- https://cultnews.com/2017/03/serious-complaints-about-cult-specialist-steven-hassan/
- https://ruskline.ru/analitika/2007/04/16/pamyati_professora_i_ogorda
- https://articles1.icsahome.com/articles/conversion-religious-change-challenge-of-nrm-csj-8-2
- https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/sekty/sektovedenie-totalitarnye-sekty/7
- https://taz.de/Hettstadt-betr-quotEin-Dorf-kaempft-gegen-das-Universelle-Lebenquot-taz-vom-1489/!1815658/
- https://iriney.ru/main/ssyilki.html
- https://culteducation.com/group/818-apologetics-index/28985-san-bernardina-county-municipal-court-district-central-division.html
- https://cultnews.com/tag/anton-hein/
- https://culteducation.com/images/pdf_docs/FAX_20151118_1447863893_31.pdf
- https://islamnews.ru/news-445299.html
- https://golosislama.com/news.php?id=25707
- https://bbnt.ru/company-requisites/1932174
- https://www.csgped.ru/csgped
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230930062952/http://www.csgped.ru/csgped
- https://web.archive.org/web/20231203135502/http://csgped.ru/csgped/okazyvaemye-uslugi
- https://web.archive.org/web/20230322062922/https://csgped.ru/protivodejstvie/profilaktika-ekstremistskoi-dejatelnosti/deprogrammirovanie.html
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9aQV3kmjug
